
Caliper Critical Dimensions
&
Caliper Size Selection Notes
Mounting:
In order for the front calipers to fit, your car must use
the later ATE calipers and mount on spindles that use a 3.5 (89mm) bolt spacing
(center to center). Typically, 1750, 2.0L
105/115 cars, and 101 Giulias (w/ Dunlop/Girling calipers) use this bolt spacing and are a
direct bolt up.
The rear caliper bolt spacing is constant across all models and
years. The rear caliper kit will fit all of these cars.
Wheels:
Wheel clearance can be an issue as well. Stock 14" x 5.5" wheels will
probably rub along the top edge of the caliper. The Turbina style will rub for sure.
It is a close thing, easily solved with a small wheel spacer. Other stock
alloy offerings - no data to this point. Any 14" x 6" wheel will most
likely fit. For instance Panasport 14"x 6" fit fine. 15" wheels
should be completely clear - by a lot.
Please contact us with specific wheel questions.
Master
Cylinders:
For suspended pedal cars, the stock 20mm master cylinder is
a workable solution for the smaller versions of the 2800 calipers. Moving to the
22mm size master will accomodate up to 1.62 fronts and the 1000 rears. For cars
using the 1.75" fronts and the 1000 rears, or for those who just prefer a hard pedal,
the 23mm master cylinder is a better choice.
Cars with floor mounted pedals have master cylinder limitations that may dictate maximum
caliper piston sizes.
Please contact us.
For any brake system,
all other facets remaining constant, the force, or grip, applied by the calipers is
directly proportional to the caliper piston area. The balance of the forces applied
front and rear, is basically a function of the ratio of front piston area to rear piston
area. The fronts with 1.375" pistons gives a piston area almost identical to
the stock ATE calipers. For this model, used with the stock rear ATE calipers, the
original brake bias will be undisturbed. The 1.62" calipers have a piston area
that is more than 70% greater than the stock ATE. It is safe to say that with this
configuration, the term brake balance no longer applies! The 1.75" version is
the same only worse! In both these cases, an adjustable brake bias valve is pretty
much mandatory.
Interestingly, with the 1.62 fronts, the addition of the big rear calipers gives a F/R
piston area ratio almost identical to the original, and brings the brake balance back
almost exactly to stock! This configuration gives almost 2X the original braking
force - without upsetting the car, gives great modulation, larger front pads for better
pad wear and local thermal management, and the light calipers give waay better
unsprung weight for better handling and road holding. It is a pretty sweet
combination, even if I do say so myself! This is by far our strongest recommendation
for a proper brake upgrade.
The use of the 1.75" piston calipers, even with the rears - best with an
adjustable bias valve.
Actually - once you start monkeying around with the brake bias, and perhaps move weight
around in the car (and take it out) the original brake balance is likely to be lost anyway
so planning on using an adjustable bias valve is not a bad idea.
Brake Boosters:
Questions about brake
boosters come up all the time. To be honest, I do not think there is a simple answer
to this question.
Everyone seems to have their own idea of what is acceptable - or desirable. Adding a
larger caliper will make the pedal more "sensitive" and probably harder to
modulate. Boosters make this situation even more sensitive. Some drivers are
able to deal with it. Some prefer to eliminate the booster entirely. My
recommendation would be to try it (carefully) with the booster, then try driving with the
booster disconnected to see if you like that better.
From my personal experience - a stripped out Super with a 2.0L engine, 1.625" fronts,
big rears, 22mm master cylinder & booster - the brakes are phenomenal and work without
any noticeable differences except for the fierce stopping power. There is no
thinking involved - just hammer the brakes as usual. For me, this is an ideal
combination of hardware.